Differences between glyphs in release-6.7 and release-7.2.0
Uniformisation of signs shapes.
I had kept a number of signs I liked from old versions of JSesh. In a number of cases (for instance C2), I found they made better font signs, as they had fewer details. But they didn't match the style of the rest of the font, which created a weird impression. Hence, I have decided to use M. Thomas latest versions of those signs in each case.
- In the case of C303, the original sign was an error.
- regarding I96, I96, I had « corrected » the original sign, giving it the shape of I96VARA - which is the shape found in the IFAO fonts. But I have decided that it was too harsh a decision, and I have prefered to revert to the original Hieroglyphica shape. You can read the documentation of I96 in JSesh about it.
Code | release-6.7 | release-7.2.0 |
---|---|---|
C10 | ![]() |
![]() |
C10A | ![]() |
![]() |
C17 | ![]() |
![]() |
C2 | ![]() |
![]() |
C232 | n/a | ![]() |
C2A | ![]() |
![]() |
C303 | ![]() |
![]() |
C39 | ![]() |
![]() |
I96 | ![]() |
![]() |
I96VARA | ![]() |
![]() |
K13 | ![]() |
![]() |
N7 | ![]() |
![]() |
S68A | n/a | ![]() |
Z2D | n/a | ![]() |